Energy-Flow Cosmology — Master Specification v1.1

Energy-Flow Cosmology (EFC)

Master Specification v1.1
Author: M. Magnusson Version: v1.1 ORCID: 0009-0002-4860-5095 DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30630500
PDF (archived version): View on Figshare (DOI)

Abstract

Energy-Flow Cosmology (EFC) treats the universe as a thermodynamic information system driven by gradients in energy flow and entropy. Instead of introducing invisible matter or energy components, EFC starts from energy distribution, entropy gradients and information capacity.

The theory is organised into three tightly coupled base layers:

This document fixes notation and baseline equations for these three layers, and provides a compact, mathematically explicit core that higher-level models, simulations and epistemic layers can reference without ambiguity. The figures are schematic and illustrate the theoretical structure rather than final data-calibrated fits.

1. Frontmatter

This document is the canonical master specification for Energy-Flow Cosmology (EFC). It defines the formal structure and relations between:

The goal is a compact, mathematically explicit core that higher-level models, simulations and epistemic layers can reference without ambiguity.

Version history


2. Overview

EFC treats the universe as a thermodynamic information system driven by gradients in energy flow and entropy. Instead of adding invisible components, the model starts from:

The three base layers are:

A central object is the local energy-flow potential:

Ef(x)=ρ(x)(1S(x)),

which couples density and entropy into a single field.


3. Illustrative Field and Profiles

This section collects schematic figures that visualise the basic EFC fields and profiles. They are theoretical examples consistent with the definitions in the later sections.

3.1 Energy-flow potential field Ef(ρ,S)

Figure 1 shows a schematic map of the energy-flow potential Ef(ρ,S)=ρ(1S) over the (ρ,S) plane.

Heatmap of Ef(rho,S)
Figure 1. Schematic heatmap of the energy-flow potential Ef(ρ,S)=ρ(1S) as a function of mass density ρ and dimensionless entropy S.

3.2 Halo profiles: mass and entropy

EFC-S models halos as joint profiles in mass density and entropy, ρh(r) and Sh(r).

EFC halo rho profile
Figure 2. Schematic halo mass density profile ρh(r).
EFC halo S profile
Figure 3. Schematic halo entropy profile Sh(r).

3.3 Rotation curves and projected density

Given a halo profile, EFC-D can be used to derive effective rotation curves and projected surface densities. Figure 4 shows a schematic comparison between an EFC-like rotation curve and an NFW-like reference. Figure 5 shows a corresponding schematic projected surface-density profile.

EFC schematic rotation curves
Figure 4. Schematic rotation curves for an EFC-like halo compared to an NFW-like reference.
EFC schematic lensing profile
Figure 5. Schematic projected surface density Σ(R) associated with an EFC-like halo profile.

3.4 Expansion history and information capacity

EFC treats the effective expansion rate H(z) as a derived quantity from flow and entropy, rather than a primary parameter. Figure 6 shows a schematic comparison between an EFC-like expansion history and a ΛCDM-like reference. Figure 7 shows a simple information-capacity curve I(S)(1S) at fixed density, relevant for EFC-C₀.

EFC schematic H(z)
Figure 6. Schematic effective expansion history H(z)/H0 for an EFC-like model compared to a ΛCDM-like reference.
EFC information capacity vs S
Figure 7. Schematic information capacity I(S)(1S) at fixed density, illustrating the EFC-C₀ baseline relation between entropy and information capacity.

4. Part I — EFC-S: Structure / Halo Layer

4.1 S₀. Low-entropy anchors

EFC-S starts from the idea that structure forms around low-entropy anchors. These are local regions where matter and energy are concentrated in configurations that allow sustained energy flows.

Let s(x) denote the entropy density at position x. A low-entropy anchor is a region A such that:

sAsbackground,

where s denotes a coarse-grained average. These anchors serve as seeds for halo formation and long-range correlations in the energy-flow field.

4.2 S₁. Halo Model of Entropy

In EFC-S, halos are not only mass overdensities, but also entropy-structured regions. A halo profile is described by both mass density and entropy:

ρh(r),Sh(r),

where ρh(r) is the radial mass density profile and Sh(r) is a dimensionless entropy profile normalised to [0,1]. The combination (ρh(r),Sh(r)) defines how effective a halo is as a driver for energy flows in EFC-D.

4.3 S₂. Radial profiles and halo classes

EFC-S allows families of halos parameterised by a small set of structural parameters (for example central density, scale radius and entropy core size). A simple example parametrisation is:

ρh(r)=ρ0f(rrs),Sh(r)=S0+(1S0)g(rrc),

where f and g are chosen shape functions, rs is a mass scale radius, and rc is an entropy core radius. Different functional choices represent different halo classes in the EFC-S catalogue.


5. Part II — EFC-D: Energy-Flow Dynamics

5.1 D₀. Local energy-flow potential Ef(ρ,S)

The local energy-flow potential Ef depends on the mass density ρ and entropy S. It captures how much structured energy-flow capacity a region has. At the baseline level:

Ef=ρ(1S).

High density with low entropy yields large Ef. High entropy suppresses Ef even for dense regions.

5.2 D₀.2. Mass density

Mass density is defined in the usual way:

ρ=mV,

where m is mass in a local region and V is the associated volume.

5.3 D₁. Energy-flow rate and temporal evolution

The temporal change of the energy-flow potential defines an energy-flow rate:

dEfdt=tEf,

where t is the derivative along the chosen time parameter (cosmic time or another evolution parameter).

Using the definition of Ef and applying the product rule, one obtains:

dEfdt=(1S)dρdtρdSdt.

This separates contributions from density change and entropy change: a region can lose energy-flow potential by losing mass, by gaining entropy, or by both.

5.4 D₂. Spatial gradients and effective acceleration

Spatial gradients in Ef define preferred directions of energy flow. At the field level:

Ef(x)=(1S(x))ρ(x)ρ(x)S(x),

which follows directly from the definition via the product rule.

At the level of an effective description, one can introduce an acceleration field a proportional to this gradient:

a(x)Ef(x).

The minus sign indicates flow towards regions of lower effective potential, in analogy with standard potential theory, but here the potential is thermodynamic–structural rather than purely gravitational.

5.5 D₃. Expansion rate and background behaviour

On large scales, an effective expansion rate H can be linked to coarse-grained energy-flow variables. A simple baseline relation uses the magnitude of Ef:

H=H0F(Ef,S),

where H0 is a reference scale and F is a dimensionless function to be fixed by confrontation with data (e.g. supernovae, BAO, CMB). The important point for this master specification is not the exact form of F, but that H is understood as a derived quantity from flow and entropy, not a primary parameter.


6. Part III — EFC-C₀: Entropy–Cognition Base Layer

6.1 C₀. Entropy and information capacity

EFC-C₀ links thermodynamic entropy to potential for information processing. The goal is not a psychological model, but a base mapping between physical structure and abstract information capacity.

A local information capacity I(x) is defined, at baseline, as:

I(x)ρ(x)(1S(x)).

This mirrors the structure of Ef, but I is interpreted as a potential for storing and transforming information rather than driving motion directly.

6.2 C₁. Local cognitive load

For a coarse-grained region R, define a total information capacity and a used fraction. The total capacity is:

Itot(R)=RI(x)dV.

A simple scalar cognitive-load variable L can then be defined as:

L=IusedItot,0L1,

where Iused is the part of the available capacity that is currently engaged in maintaining or updating structure, patterns or internal models in the region.

6.3 C₂. Informational field coupling

EFC-C₀ treats information structures as coupled to the same energy-flow fields that drive dynamics in EFC-D. At a coarse-grained level, one can express this by letting I respond to changes in Ef:

dIdt=αdEfdtβDI,

where:

This is a minimal base equation that later cognitive layers can extend.


7. Appendix: Symbols and Definitions

The table below summarises the main symbols used in this master specification.

Symbol Meaning Notes
ρ Mass density ρ=m/V
S Dimensionless entropy Normalised to [0,1] at chosen scale
Ef Local energy-flow potential Ef=ρ(1S)
t Time derivative Along chosen evolution parameter
ρh(r) Halo mass density profile Part of EFC-S halo model
Sh(r) Halo entropy profile Part of EFC-S halo model
I(x) Local information capacity Base variable in EFC-C₀
L Cognitive load L=Iused/Itot
H Effective expansion rate Derived from flow and entropy
H0 Reference expansion scale To be calibrated against data
α,β Coupling coefficients Link between Ef and I

8. How to Cite

Recommended citation

Magnusson, M. (2025). Energy-Flow Cosmology (EFC) — Master Specification v1.1. Figshare. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30630500 .

DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30630500
Author: M. Magnusson
ORCID: 0009-0002-4860-5095
Licence: CC-BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International).

This HTML representation corresponds to the archived and versioned research object stored on Figshare. Future versions of the theory (EFC v1.x, v2.x) will reference this DOI as the baseline formal specification.

9. References

This master specification can be combined with an external reference list (articles, datasets, code repositories). A fixed bibliography can be embedded in later versions.